Ralph Waldo Emerson, a famous educationist of the 19th century had said, “The things taught in schools and colleges are not an education, but the means to an education.”
From ancient times it has been considered that
education without a solid base of morals is meaningless. Our present education
system is marred by the present
evaluation system instead of the pupil's
understanding of the subject. This system does not stress upon the amelioration
of the curiosity so that the student will earn expertise in the field of his
liking and will explore further to add to the branch of knowledge he is in.
Indeed we can see that the curiosity of the student is suppressed forcing him
to be bound to the curriculum. Freeing the students from the yoke of the
orthodox education system is indeed needed in our country and let us hope that
soon the necessary reforms will take place.
Moral education forms an important part of the education to
make the student pro-society in which he lives in with a positive and
constructive mindset. The morals preached by the thinkers and philosophers
differ or contradict many times and there always is debate among philosophers
as to what is moral and what is not. The acts thought moral at some places can
be treated as immoral elsewhere or the immoral of the past may prove to be
moral on the grounds of present standards. Some say that discussing morals is
immoral for they are not permanent.
And still, we need morals for a better, more civilized society.
Morals that bring every individual together to form a homogeneous, cohesive society for a better future and prosperity in both economic and intellectual senses are always preferable. And this is what should be taught to the children
when their minds are shaping. Jain philosophy believes in the principle of “live
and let live. No harm should be caused to not only humans but also any living
being.” This is the highest principle, which may not be practicable to its fullest
extent, but the feelings behind this principle are very novel and humanitarian
of a high degree. In the education system, besides educating the pupils in a
variety of branches of knowledge, the prime concern should be to make them better members of society, and that is not possible without moral education. Jain
principles are very helpful in this effort.
Our education system hardly provides the moral education
that can help him become a responsible citizen. A citizen is not only a
political living entity but an individual who inspires or gets inspired for the
betterment of the self and society. Though today's moral education is taking
root in the education system, it seems that it is failing in creating a positive
humanistic attitude and faith in the overall social goals of the students. This
is happening because though we teach the necessary morals those educationalists
feel necessary; they have failed in teaching the fundamental philosophy behind
the morals that are being taught. This is why moral education just has become
customary without reaching the hearts of the students.
This necessitates the definition of moral education and
choosing the proper philosophy to strengthen it. We find many values defined in
Jain philosophy (Not religion) that can help the students in not becoming a better
citizen but a person who is exploiting his all inner powers with immense
curiosity and quest of raising and solving the questions to make the world even
better so that the social values and the values of life are aligned
together.
Jain philosophy is secular. It does not believe in any
creator or wish-fulfilling god. It believes every living soul is a god, but
because of the ignorance has fallen in the crevasse of the emotive world that
engulfs it in the chaotic dark. With good deeds, he can raise himself and can
help to rise up the ladder of human upgradation. However, the present moral
education is so far limited to teaching civic rules without getting to the bottom
of morals.
In moral education, the following points are important to
teach-
1.
Why and how to learn?
2.
What values should determine the
relationship between the student and the teacher?
3.
What is the utility of the subjects
the student learns to himself and society?
4.
What is the ultimate eventuality of
the subject that the student is taught?
5.
Should education mean study for
study or to quench the curiosity of the student, making him able enough to add
his own to the field of his interest?
The moral values have a necessary social aspect as well, which
may include-
a. Which moral values are preferred and why for the cohesive
society?
b. On which fundamentals can the relationship between a person
and society become healthy and stronger?
c. What are the pros and cons of individualism and
totalitarianism, and which is preferable?
d. How can principles like non-violence, truth, and non-attachment be used, and to can the principle of many-sided reality be used to
solve the socio-moral issues?
e. How to take a universal approach in the subjects taught
in the schools?
f. How to cope with the multi-cultural environment?
Then we come to the values, those are very personal, those
every student should know and understand, and that is-
1.
Every individual has an innate
ability to become enlightened in any field of his choice.
2.
The universal values like truth,
non-violence, and non-attachment, which have no barriers of caste, creed, nation, or religion.
3.
Positive mindset through meditation,
diet, and physical exercise.
4.
Learning to compete with self, not
the world to attain associative behavior for social and individual happiness.
5.
Having a good memory is okay, but the
deep understanding of the subject is far better.
We will discuss in detail the essence of the Jain moral system
that can help modern educationalists to modify their approach towards moral
education.
*
No comments:
Post a Comment